Skip to content

Infrastructure · Automation · Applied AI

Infrastructure that builds, heals and explains itself.

Black Mesa designs the whole machine, not just the tool. Cloud platforms as code, operations that run unattended, monitoring that means something, and AI that does real work.

When something says "that's not possible", that's usually where we start.

Clouds
AWS · Azure · GCP
Pipelines
GitHub · ADO · CodePipeline
Response
an engineer, not a queue
Schematic of a Black Mesa platform: versioned modules flow through CI/CD into environments, the fleet is automated, monitored, and an AI agent closes the loop by proposing fixes. AWS · Azure · GCP providers modules v2.4.1 released CI / CD plan → approve → apply environments dev · staging · prod fleet ansible · patched 03:14 monitoring checks · alerts · SLA ai agent triage → proposes PR

Why Black Mesa

"That's not possible" is a to‑do list.

Most of what we've built started with a tool, a vendor or a document insisting something couldn't be done. We don't accept that at face value. We read the source, trace the API, and keep going until it works or we can prove why it can't.

A surprising number of the fixes in our history exist because we refused to believe a system worked the way it claimed to. It usually didn't.

You talk to the engineer who does the work. No account managers, no hand-offs, no "let me check with the team".

Open source first

lower cost, no lock-in

Whole package

not just the tool

Knowledge transfer

you keep the keys

things-we-were-told.log
  • 01

    Terraform can't keep module versions in sync across dozens of deployment repos.

    ✓ Terragrunt tooling that bumps versions itself the moment a module is released.

  • 02

    Peering config has to be hand-written for every environment.

    ✓ Generated from one source of truth. Add a network, the peering appears.

  • 03

    Firewall rules live in the portal, that's just how it is.

    ✓ Rules in a CSV, validated in CI, applied by the pipeline, reviewed like code.

  • 04

    Patching needs a change window and a human on the console.

    ✓ A 12-step unattended runbook, ticket and monitoring blackout included.

  • 05

    The monitoring product doesn't support that check.

    ✓ Then we write the check.

  • 06

    A site like this needs an agency and a quarter.

    ✓ You're looking at the counter-argument.

How it runs

From 'can we?' to 'it's live' without the theatre

  1. 01

    Listen

    day 1

    A conversation about what hurts, what's been tried, and what you've been told can't be done. Usually one call.

  2. 02

    Prototype

    week 1

    Something real in your environment within days, not a slide deck. If the idea doesn't survive contact with reality, better to know now.

  3. 03

    Ship

    weeks, not quarters

    Built as code, in your repos, on your pipelines. Every change reviewed, every apply logged, every check green before we call it done.

  4. 04

    Hand over

    yours to keep

    Documentation that writes itself, a walkthrough with your team, and an engineer who still picks up the phone afterwards.

Next step

Tell us what you were told isn't possible.

A short conversation is enough to know whether we can help. No sales deck, no discovery workshop, just an engineer on the other end.